| Comparing the Award
Models and Criteria: The European Quality Award and the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award evolved in response to different objectives (the European Quality Award was, from the start, aiming at the improving organizations, the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award's first focus was the improvement of the products and services delivered) and set within different cultures. However, they have a similar purpose. This shared purpose is illustrated by the following similarities:
The models and assessment criteria of the three awards are meant to act as a framework for improvement. They should be interpreted for specific use within an organization. The criteria are relatively open and non-prescriptive; none attempt to place all organizations within the same tight framework. The fact that a wide range of organizations uses the criteria, demonstrates the adaptability of the processes. In fact, there is a similar flexibility within the framework provided by the ISO 9000 series of standards. In the introduction to the ISO 9004-1, 1994 guidelines written: "The International Standards in the ISO 9000 family describe what elements quality systems should encompass, but now how a specific organization should implement these elements. Because the needs of organizations vary, it is not the purpose of these International Standards to enforce uniformity of quality systems. The design and implementation of a quality system will be influenced by the particular objectives, products, processes and individual practices of the organization."
Comparison between the requirements according to ISO 9001 and the different criteria in the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. A company certified according to ISO 9001 will get about 250 points in an assessment according to the criteria in the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award.
Copyright © 2009 by the METU. All rights reserved. |