Additional
TRIZ Tools:
The TRIZ methodology can be adapted to
different kinds of problem solving. The method described before is relatively simple but
forces the user to pre-formulate the problem in terms of standard engineering parameters.
It rarely leads to an exhaustive set of solutions. It is used primarily to solve
relatively easy problems. More difficult problems are solved with the following more
precise tools.
ARIZ (Algorithm for Inventive Problem
Solving):
A systematic procedure for identifying
solutions without apparent contradictions. Depending on the nature of the problem,
anywhere from five to sixty steps may be involved. From an unclear technical problem, the
underlying technical problem can be revealed. It can be used with levels two, three, and
four problems. Basic steps are:
1. Formulate the problem |
2. Transform the problem into a model |
3. Analyze the model |
4. Resolve physical contradictions |
5. Formulate ideal solution |
Su-Field Analysis:
A tool for expressing function statements in
terms of one object acting on another object. The objects are called substances and
the action a field. Su-field analysis is helpful in identifying functional
failures. By looking at actions as fields, undesirable or insufficient actions can be
countered by applying opposing or an intensified fields.
Anticipatory Failure Determination (AFD):
Prevention of unanticipated failures is
important in new product development. AFD, in effect, invents failure mechanisms and then
examines the possibilities of their actually occurring. Factors contributing to the
failures can be eliminated with this highly pro-active technique.
Directed Product Evolution (DPE):
Traditional technological forecasting tries to
predict the "future characteristics of � machines, procedures, or techniques."
It relies on surveys, simulations, and trends to create a probabilistic model of future
developments. It gives a forecast, but does not invent the technology being forecasted.
Altshuller, by studying hundreds of thousands
of patents, was able to determine eight patterns of how technological systems develop over
time. Based upon the patterns of how people think rather than what people think, DPE is
like a road map into the future. Rather than predicting future technologies, one can
systematically invent future technologies using DPE. The eight patterns of Directed
Product Evolution are:
1. |
Technology follows a life cycle of birth, growth,
maturity, decline. |
2. |
Increasing ideality. |
3. |
Uneven development of subsystems resulting in
contradictions. |
4. |
Increasing dynamism and controllability. |
5. |
Increasing complexity, followed by simplicity through
integration. |
6. |
Matching and mismatching of parts. |
7. |
Transition from macrosystems to microsystems using
energy fields to achieve better performance or control. |
8. |
Decreasing human involvement with increasing
automation. |
By analyzing the current technology level and
contradictions in our products, TRIZ can be used to see the evolutionary progress and
create the future. Direct Product Evolution can be used to develop patents for future
technology before one's competitors.
Suggested further reading:
Terninko,
J., Zusman, A., Zlotin, B., STEP-by-STEP TRIZ
Altshuller,
G., And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared
 
Copyright © 2000 by the METU. All
rights reserved.
Last updated: February 18, 2000
|